4.7 Article

Facile fabrication of BiVO4/Bi2S3/NiCoO2 for significant photoelectrochemical water splitting

Journal

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
Volume 574, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.151562

Keywords

Photoelectrochemical water splitting; Heterojunction; Catalyst; BiVO4; Bi2S3; NiCoO2

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel strategy was developed to fabricate a BiVO4/Bi2S3/NiCoO2 photoelectrode, demonstrating significantly higher photocurrent density and stability compared to bare BiVO4. The importance of NiCoO2 and Bi2S3 in enhancing photoelectrochemical water splitting performance was emphasized through various electrochemical studies.
For photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting, BiVO4 is the most efficient light-absorber metal oxide; nevertheless, significant charge recombination and low water oxidation kinetics have been restricted its effectiveness. Therefore the idea of creating heterojunction by using metal sulfide followed by the decoration of catalyst were employed to obtain the ideal water splitting performance of the photoelectrode. In this study simple and unique strategy is developed to fabricate BiVO4/Bi2S3/NiCoO2 photoelectrode through facile and scalable solution route. Structural, morphological and optical analysis shows the stepwise fabrication of Bi2S3 and NiCoO2 upon BiVO4. BiVO4/Bi2S3/NiCoO2 composite demonstrates similar to 5.5 times higher photocurrent density than bare BiVO4 with cathodic shift of similar to 220 mV and greatly stable in 0.5 M Na2SO4 electrolyte. Photoelectrochemical studies involving (i) estimation of flat band position, (ii) charge transfer resistance from impedance studies (iii) prediction of band alignment and (iv) significant increase in the injection efficiency and separation efficiency together signifies the importance of the NiCoO2 and Bi2S3 in the BiVO4/Bi2S3/NiCoO2 photoanode that emphasize superb PEC water splitting performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available