4.7 Article

Optical properties of N-polar GaN: The possible role of nitrogen vacancy-related defects

Journal

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
Volume 566, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.150734

Keywords

Nitrides; Molecular beam epitaxy; Photoluminescence; Time-resolved Photoluminescence; Crystal morphology

Funding

  1. Polish National Centre for Research and Development Grant [PBS3/A3/23/2015, LIDER/29/0185/L-7/15/NCBR/2016]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Detailed comparison of optical quality of GaN layers grown homoepitaxially on bulk Ga-polar and N-polar substrates by plasma-assisted molecular beam epitaxy was conducted. Layers grown on N-polar substrates showed one order of magnitude lower photo-luminescence intensity and decay time due to gallium-rich conditions, while nitrogen-rich growth conditions greatly improved the optical quality by suppressing formation of nitrogen vacancy-related point defects. Layers grown on N-polar substrates achieved linewidth below 1 meV and lifetime above 0.1 ns at He temperature.
Detailed comparison of optical quality of GaN layers grown homoepitaxially on bulk Ga-polar and N-polar substrates by plasma-assisted molecular beam epitaxy was performed. One order of magnitude lower photo-luminescence (PL) intensity and decay time at room temperature was observed for layers grown on N-polar substrates, realized using gallium-rich conditions. This nonradiative recombination channel was very efficient also at liquid helium temperatures, what was evidenced by no improvement in PL time decay. Optical quality of GaN layer (PL intensity, lifetimes) grown on N-polar substrates was greatly improved by using nitrogen-rich growth conditions. We attribute this improvement to suppressed formation of nitrogen vacancy-related point defects. Finally, linewidth below 1 meV and lifetime above 0.1 ns (DX line, He temperature) were obtained for layers grown on N-polar substrate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available