4.6 Article

Calculation of Spectral Optical Constants Using Combined Ellipsometric and Reflectance Methods for Smooth and Rough Bulk Samples

Journal

APPLIED SPECTROSCOPY
Volume 75, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/00037028211047898

Keywords

Optical constants; complex refractive index; ellipsometry; polarized reflectance; specularity factor; infrared

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An alternative method to calculate the optical constants n and k is presented in this paper, which utilizes both ellipsometric measurements and s-polarized specular reflectance measurements. This method is applicable to bulk samples with either smooth or rough surfaces, providing spectral optical constants consistent with s-polarized reflectance measurements.
Spectra of the optical constants n and k of a substance are often deduced from spectroscopic measurements, performed on a thick and homogeneous sample, and from a model used to simulate these measurements. Spectra obtained for n and k using the ellipsometric method generally produce polarized reflectance simulations in strong agreement with the experimental measurements, but they sometimes introduce significant discrepancies over limited spectral ranges, whereas spectra of n and k obtained with the single-angle reflectance method require a perfectly smooth sample surface to be viable. This paper presents an alternative method to calculate n and k. The method exploits both ellipsometric measurements and s-polarized specular reflectance measurements, and compensates for potential surface scattering effects with the introduction of a specularity factor. It is applicable to bulk samples having either a smooth or a rough surface. It provides spectral optical constants that are consistent with s-polarized reflectance measurements. Demonstrations are performed in the infrared region using a glass slide (smooth surface) and a pellet of compressed ammonium sulfate powder (rough surface).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available