4.7 Article

In-air hand gesture signature using transfer learning and its forgery attack

Journal

APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING
Volume 113, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2021.108033

Keywords

Dynamic signature; Hand gesture signature; Transfer learning; Gesture recognition; Forgeries attack

Funding

  1. Multimedia University internal Mini Fund, Malaysia [MMUI/180180]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Transfer learning in hand gesture-based signature classification shows robustness against forgery attacks, achieving high precision and recall rates, with low error rates in random and skilled forgery attacks.
In-air hand gesture signature (HGS) has become a new and emerging technique for dynamic signature recognition due to its advantageous touchless acquisition procedure. Unlike the conventional dynamic signature, HGS creates general images that carrying the spatial and temporal information of the signing action. Deep learning algorithms are prominent to learn these image features. However, they require tremendous amount of data to reach an optimal model which make the collection process computationally expensive. Transfer learning becomes an alternative solution for small sample size problems. This paper aims to investigate the feasibility of transfer learning in classifying a hand gesture-based signature. In our system, the hand region is detected and segmented from each depth image. Then, the salient spatial and temporal features are formed from various images. The knowledge of a pre-trained model is transferred and reused to classify the new seen image features. In this paper, we further investigate the robustness of the proposed approach against two common forgery attacks, (1) random forgeries and (2) skilled forgeries. Empirical results demonstrate that the proposed approach can achieves 99.03% of precision and 98.89% of recall in classifying HGS. On top of this, the proposed approach also manifests its robustness in handling different kinds of forgery attacks, i.e. achieving low error rates of 0.78% in random forgery attack and 4.88% in skilled forgery attack. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available