4.6 Article

Computational analysis of transient XMCD sum rules for laser pumped systems: When do they fail?

Journal

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
Volume 120, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0080138

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. DFG [A04, A02, SH498/4-1, 2059421]
  2. [TRR227]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the highly non-equilibrium conditions of laser-induced spin dynamics, the validity of using x-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD) sum rules to track femtosecond spin dynamics remains an open question. This study compares spin moments obtained spectroscopically with those calculated directly from density functional theory (DFT) densities and finds that for low fluence pump pulses, the two methods are in excellent agreement. However, for short and/or intense pulses with high fluence, the XMCD sum rules fail with errors exceeding 50%, likely due to the excitation of charges out of the d-band and into sp-character bands.
In highly non-equilibrium conditions of laser induced spin dynamics, magnetic moments can only be obtained from the spectral information, most commonly from spectroscopy of core or semi-core states using the so-called x-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD) sum rules. The validity of these sum rules in tracking femtosecond spin dynamics remains, however, an open question. Employing the time dependent extension of the density functional theory (TD-DFT), we compare spectroscopically obtained spin moments with those directly calculated from TD-DFT densities. We find that for pump pulses with low fluence, these two very distinct routes to the spin moment are, for Co and Ni, in excellent agreement, validating the experimental approach. However, for short and/or intense pulses with high fluence, the XMCD sum rules fail with errors exceeding 50%. This failure is most pronounced during the pulse and occurs when the pump pulse excites charges out of the d-band and into sp-character bands, invalidating the core or semi-core to d-state transitions assumed by the XMCD sum rules.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available