4.6 Article

Role of primary and secondary processes in the ultrafast spin dynamics of nickel

Journal

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
Volume 120, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0077213

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [TRR 173-268565370]
  2. Dynamics and Topology Center - State of Rhineland Palatinate

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the effects of pump photon energy on ultrafast demagnetization dynamics in ferromagnetic nickel, revealing that magnetization dynamics primarily depend on absorbed energy rather than pump photon energy. Stark differences exist between optically excited electronic distributions and demagnetization dynamics, while the measured dynamics can be reproduced using a model based on local temperatures.
The magnetic response of a ferromagnet after an ultrafast optical excitation can be connected to the underlying electronic dynamics either via primary excitation processes during the laser pulse or via secondary collision processes. In the latter case, the information on the details of the excitation is lost and, therefore, the electron dynamics can be described using quasi-equilibrium concepts. In this work, we study the effect of the pump photon energy on the ultrafast demagnetization dynamics in ferromagnetic nickel. We find that the magnetization dynamics for similar absorbed energies for a range of pump photon energies are almost identical and depend only on the absorbed energy. This is in stark contrast to characteristic differences in the optically excited electronic distributions, as calculated from the band structure. In addition, the measured fluence-dependent dynamics can be reproduced with a model based on local temperatures. These findings indicate that it is mainly secondary processes that are responsible for the observed demagnetization dynamics. (C) 2022 Author(s).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available