4.6 Article

Design of InAs nanosheet arrays with ultrawide polarization-independent high absorption for infrared photodetection

Journal

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
Volume 120, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0066507

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61974166]
  2. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [2021JJ20080]
  3. Australian Research Council (ARC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, InAs nanosheet arrays were proposed and designed to achieve polarization-independent, angle-insensitive, and ultrawide infrared absorption. By optimizing the design, high absorption in a broad wavelength range from visible light to mid-wave infrared was achieved.
InAs nanowires have been considered as good candidates for infrared photodetection. However, one-dimensional geometry of a nanowire makes it unsuitable for broadband light absorption. In this work, we propose and design InAs nanosheet arrays to achieve polarization-independent, angle-insensitive, and ultrawide infrared absorption. Simulations demonstrate that two-dimensional InAs nanosheets can support multiple resonance modes, thus leading to a strong and broadband absorption from visible light to mid-wave infrared. Moreover, we can tune polarization-dependent property in InAs nanosheets to be polarization-insensitive by forming a nanosheet based clover-like and snowflake-like nanostructures. We further optimized the design of InAs nanosheet arrays based on such structures and achieved high absorption (up to 99.6%) covering a broad wavelength range from 500 to 3200 nm. These absorption properties are much superior to their nanowire and planar film counterparts, making it attractive for infrared photodetection applications. The architecture of such nanostructures can provide a promising route for the development of high-performance room-temperature broadband infrared photodetectors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available