4.6 Article

2.7 μm quantum cascade detector: Above band gap energy intersubband detection

Journal

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
Volume 120, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0076856

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Office of Aerospace Research and Development/Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA9550-17-1-0340, FA8655-22-1-7170]
  2. European Commission [828893]
  3. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union [871529]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quantum cascade detectors (QCDs) are presented utilizing an InAs/AlAs0.16Sb0.84 lattice matched to an InAs substrate, showing low effective electron mass and high conduction band offset for high optical absorption strength. The QCD has a peak spectral response at 2.7 mu m (0.459 eV) and a peak specific detectivity of 1.14 x 10^8 Jones.
Quantum cascade detectors (QCDs) are mid-infrared and far-infrared, low-noise, photovoltaic detectors utilizing intersubband transitions. This Letter presents an InAs/AlAs0.16Sb0.84 based QCD lattice matched to an InAs substrate. This material system exhibits properties like a low effective electron mass of the well material of 0.023 m(0), beneficial for higher optical absorption strength, and a high conduction band offset of 2.1 eV, allowing the design of QCDs in the mid-infrared and near-infrared region. The presented QCD has a peak spectral response at 2.7 mu m (0.459 eV), the center of a CO2 absorption band. To enable top side illumination, a grating was implemented. This additionally bypasses absorption by the narrow bandgap 0.345 eV (3.54 mu m) InAs substrate material. The QCD has a peak responsivity at a room temperature of 5.63 mA/W and a peak specific detectivity of 1.14 x 10(8) Jones. (c) 2022 Author(s). All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available