4.6 Article

Enhancing hole injection by electric dipoles for efficient blue InP QLEDs

Journal

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
Volume 119, Issue 22, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0071508

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program [2017YFE0120400, 2019YFB1704600]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61875082, 61905107]
  3. Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province [2019B010924001]
  4. Innovation Project of Department of Education of Guangdong Province [2019KTSCX157]
  5. Shenzhen Innovation Project [JCYJ20190809152411655]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study introduced an ultrathin MoO3 electric dipole layer to balance carrier injection, resulting in an enhanced maximal external quantum efficiency of blue InP QLEDs, providing a method to achieve high-efficiency QLEDs.
The unbalanced carrier injection is a key factor that deteriorates the performance of blue InP quantum dot light-emitting diodes (QLEDs). Therefore, to achieve efficient blue InP QLEDs, an effective strategy that balances carrier injection through enhancing the hole injection and transport is in demand. In this study, we introduced an ultrathin MoO3 electric dipole layer between the hole injection layer and the hole transport layer (HTL) to form a pair of dipole-induced built-in electric fields with forward resultant direction to enhance hole injection and facilitate the balance of carrier injection. Meanwhile, the p-doping effect by MoO3 leads to increased carrier concentration and decreased trap density of interfacial HTL, therefore improved its effective hole mobility. Consequently, the maximal external quantum efficiency of blue InP QLEDs was enhanced from 1.0% to 2.1%. This work provides an effective method to balance carrier injection by modulating hole injection and transport, indicating the feasibility to realize high-efficiency QLEDs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available