4.7 Article

A sloshing induced Tsunami: 2018 Palu Bay event

Journal

APPLIED OCEAN RESEARCH
Volume 117, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apor.2021.102915

Keywords

Tsunami generation; Sloshing effect; 2018 Sulawesi earthquake; Palu Bay; Numerical model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study demonstrates that the sloshing effect dominates tsunami events in semi-closed water bodies, leading to the disastrous 2018 Palu Bay tsunami. The lack of consideration for sloshing in existing tsunami warning systems resulted in the failure to predict the event correctly. Urgent updates to global tsunami warning systems may be necessary to incorporate the potential impact of the sloshing effect for future disaster prevention.
A disastrous tsunami is generally known as the ocean water response to an offshore fault rupture as the consequence of a submarine earthquake. Such a physical understanding, however, cannot explain the generation of the 2018 Sulawesi earthquake induced Palu Bay tsunami. In this study, it is demonstrated that the sloshing effect dominates a tsunami event if it occurs in a semi-closed water body near the epicenter and the ground motion triggered by the earthquake is strong enough in the horizontal directions. The 2018 Palu Bay tsunami became disastrous since the sloshing effect played a significant role while landslides also contributed to the big runup at some particular locations. The present study is significant since sloshing is usually considered to play a minor role in amplifying a tsunami wave and has not been included in existing tsunami warning systems. Owing to such a limitation, the 2018 Palu Bay tsunami event was not correctly predicted at all. To prevent a future tragedy, an urgent update of the worldwide tsunami warning system in service may have to be performed to include an option for possible consideration of the sloshing effect.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available