4.7 Article

Silent Vascular Catastrophes in the Brain in Term Newborns: Strategies for Optical Imaging

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSTQE.2016.2523982

Keywords

Intracranial hemorrhage; laser speckle imaging; mechanisms; multi-modal diagnostics; multifractal methods; newborns; neuroimaging; NIRS

Funding

  1. Grant of Russian Science Foundation [14-15-00128]
  2. Bulgarian National Science Fund [DFNI-B02/9/2014]
  3. National Nature Science Foundation of China [81171376, 91232710]
  4. Science Fund for Creative Research Group of China [61421064]
  5. Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities in China [B07038]
  6. Russian Science Foundation [14-15-00128] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this review, we describe the phenomenon of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), which occurs spontaneously within the first 2-3 days of life in full-term newborns without any clinical symptoms, but with long-term neurological outcomes in many cases. We give the estimated frequency and possible mechanisms responsible for silent ICH with main focus on the cerebral blood flow (CBF) and oxygenation measurements using non-invasive optical methods. We overview the current multi-modal technologies that are widely used in clinics and experiments for the study of ICH during the first days of life: magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, cerebral oximetry based on near infrared spectroscopy, as well as laser speckle imaging and diffuse correlation spectroscopy as a priority technology for experimental study of cerebral hemodynamics. We discuss the advantages and disadvantages of these methods. We identify key trends in experimental works and show areas for future research of ICH in term newborns. Future studies will help to improve our ability to optimize prognosis, diagnosis, and treatment of asymptomatic neonates with silent ICH.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available