4.7 Article

An analysis of the integrated lot-sizing and cutting-stock problem formulation

Journal

APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING
Volume 99, Issue -, Pages 155-165

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2021.06.009

Keywords

Lot-sizing problem; Cutting-stock problem; Column generation; Relax-and-fix heuristic

Funding

  1. SAo Paulo Research Foundation-FAPESP [2016/01860-1, 2017/18192-4]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper discusses the status and research on the integrated lot-sizing and cutting-stock problem, proposing an alternative formulation that can provide better solutions. The improvements made through analytical analysis and case studies show the effectiveness of the simplified version, which can potentially lead to better solutions and impacts future research in this field.
The integrated lot-sizing and cutting-stock problem has become a trend in the last decades for its applicability and advantage. Consequently, different approaches and formulations have been developed. One of them, which is widespread and related to the production and cutting process of paper, is the research subject of this paper. Fundamental considerations about the literature model are discussed and an alternative formulation is proposed, which consists of a simplified version that can provide better solutions. The upgrade modifications are proved analytically and an instance is analyzed to exemplify the discussed improvement. Moreover, computational tests are performed to compare both formulations. The novelty of the proposed formulation is the possibility of finding better solutions through the reduction of a constraint set, which guarantees the flexibility given by item and object inventories in meeting demand and it also enables a reduction in the total amount of produced paper. The proposed formulation has a significant impact on future research since the addressed model is the target of many scientific researches and practical applications. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available