4.8 Article

Multi-objective planning of regional integrated energy system aiming at exergy efficiency and economy

Journal

APPLIED ENERGY
Volume 306, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118120

Keywords

Regional integrated energy system; Exergy efficiency; Discrete energy flow calculation method; Energy structure selection; Multi-objective planning and optimization; TS-NSGA II algorithm

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Foundation of State Grid Corporation of China [SGTJDK00DWJS1900272]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces a bi-level planning optimization model that takes into account both the quantity and quality of energy, and uses matter-element information theory and algorithms for the planning of regional integrated energy systems. The proposed model is verified through a case study, showing a balance between improving exergy efficiency and economy.
This paper introduces the exergy efficiency that takes into account both the quantity and quality of energy, and constructs a bi-level planning optimization model of the regional integrated energy system. Factors such as equipment exergy efficiency are considered by the upper-level planning model. Through matter-element information theory and Frequent Patterm-growth algorithm, the energy structure of the regional integrated energy system planning is determined by quantitative means. The lower-level planning model is intended for economy and exergy efficiency, and the tabu search algorithm is embedded in the solving algorithm of the multi-objective genetic algorithm for solving, determining the capacity of each equipment in the energy structure. In the case study, three comparison schemes are used to verify the proposed model and method through the regional integrated energy system in a resort town in northern China. Among them, Scheme 1 is devised for economy, Scheme 2 is proposed for economy and energy efficiency, and Scheme 3 is intended for economy and exergy efficiency. The results show that compared with the Scheme 1 and Scheme 2, the system exergy efficiency of Scheme 3 corresponding to this model has increased by 17.34% and 11.17%, respectively. Despite an increase of 10.61% in total annualized cost in Scheme 3 compared to Scheme 1, there is a decrease of 6.37% compared to Scheme 2. Despite the conflict in improving exergy efficiency and economy, there is still a balance to draw in the proposed model in this paper.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available