4.8 Article

Techno-econo-environmental comparisons of zero- and low-emission heavy-duty trucks

Journal

APPLIED ENERGY
Volume 308, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118327

Keywords

Hydrogen; Wind energy; Heavy-duty truck; Decarbonisation; Energy system; Zero emissions

Funding

  1. EU Interreg North-West Europe programme through the GENerating energy secure COMMunities through smart renewable hydrogen (GENCOMM) project [NWE 334]
  2. Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland (SEAI) RDD Programme [RDD 445]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents the results of techno-economic-environmental modeling for decarbonizing heavy-duty trucks in the quarrying sector. The evaluation of transitioning to zero- or low-emission trucks is based on the total cost of carbon abatement (TCA), considering the total cost of truck ownership and life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions. The study compares different powertrain configurations and assesses the production and refueling performance for each powertrain. The results show that fuel cost is the major contributor to total cost of ownership (TCO) for all powertrains except battery electric trucks, which are dominated by infrastructure cost. Off-grid systems have higher TCOs but can achieve greater reduction in greenhouse gas emissions compared to on-grid systems. Battery electric trucks and diesel-hydrogen dual-fuel engine trucks have the lowest TCA for fleets of 100 trucks. Increasing carbon tax can make low-emission trucks more competitive.
This paper presents the results of techno-econo-environmental modelling of options to decarbonise fleets of four-axle trucks in the quarrying sector. The key parameter used to evaluate the performance of transitioning from diesel heavy-duty trucks (HDT) to zero-or low-emission heavy-duty trucks (ZLETs) is the total cost of carbon abatement (TCA). TCA is calculated by using the total cost of truck ownership on a discounted cost per km basis (TCO) and well-to-wheel (WTW) life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. TCO includes the costs of the vehicle, infrastructure, fuel, maintenance, and resale, and is evaluated for five different powertrain configura-tions: (1) battery electric heavy-duty truck (BET), (2) plug-in hybrid electric heavy-duty truck (PHET), (3) diesel internal combustion engine heavy-duty truck (ICET), (4) diesel-hydrogen dual-fuel engine heavy-duty truck (DFET), and (5) hydrogen fuel cell electric heavy-duty truck (FCET). Combinations of wind and/or grid elec-tricity supply BETs and PHETs. Hydrogen is also produced from the same energy sources via electrolysis for DFETs and FCETs. The hourly electricity and hydrogen production and refuelling performance for each pow-ertrain are assessed for on-and off-grid systems. The production capacity and costs can be optimally sized using the total number of trucks, annual operational distance, and fuel economy to meet the annual fuel demand for each powertrain. Results show the fuel cost is the largest contributor to TCOs for all powertrains except the BET, which is dominated by infrastructure cost. The TCOs for all powertrains in off-grid system are higher compared to on-grid systems, which require smaller equipment sizes. In contrast, more WTW emissions for all powertrains can be abated by off-grid system compared to on-grid system. The minimum TCAs for fleets of 100 trucks in on -and off-grid systems are found for BETs and DFETs, respectively. The total number of trucks has a significant impact on the reduction of TCO and TCA . Higher carbon tax ( euro / tonne of CO2 emitted) in the f uture can also help the ZLETs to be more competitive.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available