4.7 Article

A broadband sound absorber of hybrid-arranged perforated panels with perforated partitions

Journal

APPLIED ACOUSTICS
Volume 188, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2021.108547

Keywords

Perforated panel; Enhanced sound absorption coefficient; Equivalent circuit method; Perforated partitions; Hybrid arrangement

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11761131006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study presents a novel hybrid-arranged perforated panel structure by integrating parts of panels with different perforated characteristics and cavity depths, which greatly enhances the sound absorption performance by adjusting parameters. The effectiveness of the analytical model is verified through the application of the equivalent circuit method and finite element numerical simulation, showing wideband and high sound absorption level of the model in acoustic experiments.
ABSTR A C T Several parts of panels with different perforated characteristics and cavity depths are integrated to present a novel hybrid-arranged perforated panel with perforated partitions. Perforated panels in the same layer are divided by perforated partitions. By designing the parameters of the perforated panels and the depths of the air cavities, the sound absorption coefficient (SAC) of the structure can be greatly enhanced. The equivalent circuit method (ECM) is applied to analyze the acoustic impedance of the structure. An acoustic experiment and numerical simulations by the finite element method are carried out to validate the results of the proposed analytical model. From the investigations, it is found that the SAC of the model has not only a wideband but also a high sound absorption level. The hybrid-arranged perforated panel with perforated partitions provides a new way to design sound absorbers for practical applications. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available