4.2 Article

The effect of frequency of augmented input on the auditory comprehension of narratives for persons with Wernicke's aphasia

Journal

APHASIOLOGY
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages 363-381

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02687038.2021.2016593

Keywords

Alternative and augmentative communication; augmented input; comprehension; stroke; Wernicke's aphasia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to investigate the impact of augmented input on auditory comprehension accuracy in individuals with Wernicke's aphasia. The results showed that augmented input can improve auditory comprehension of narratives for some patients and specifically affect comprehension of inferential questions. Thus, providing appropriate augmented input is crucial for the rehabilitation of individuals with aphasia.
Background Augmented input refers to the support of any form of linguistic or visual strategy to enhance understanding of language. Previous research for persons with aphasia predominantly focused on the various types of augmented input that can be used to support comprehension. Aims The purpose of this study was to determine and compare the effect of varying amounts of augmented input on the accuracy of auditory comprehension for persons with Wernicke's aphasia Method & Procedures A within-subject design was conducted with nine participants with Wernicke's aphasia. Based on previous studies performed by the authors, the participants reviewed a relevant high-content image, listened to three narratives in three conditions, namely 0%, 50%, and 100%, augmented input with active partner pointing (AI-PP), and then responded to comprehension items based on the narratives. Outcomes & Results Of the nine participants, four gave more accurate responses to comprehension items in the 50% AI-PP condition, three gave more accurate responses in the 100% AI-PP condition, and two participants scored the same in either the 50% and 100% or the 0% and 50% conditions. Furthermore, participants did significantly better in the 50% than 0% augmented input condition when answering inferential rather than factual questions. Conclusion The main clinical implication is that supporting narrative auditory comprehension with augmented input, used as pretask and during-task stimulation, seems to improve the auditory comprehension of narratives for some persons with Wernicke's aphasia. Moreover, providing augmented input for narratives seems to have a significant effect on the auditory comprehension of inferential questions for some persons with Wernicke's aphasia. Continuous research is necessary to determine what types and frequency of augmented input will enhance auditory comprehension for persons with aphasia, specifically Wernicke's aphasia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available