Modelled Target Attainment after Temocillin Treatment in Severe Pneumonia: Systemic and Epithelial Lining Fluid Pharmacokinetics of Continuous versus Intermittent Infusions

The objective of this article is to describe the population pharmacokinetics (PK) of temocillin administered via continuous infusion (CI) versus intermittent infusion (II) in critically ill patients with pneumonia. Secondary objectives included characterization of epithelial lining fluid (ELF)/plasma penetration ratios and determination of the probability of target attainment (PTA) for a range of MICs. Thirty-two mechanically ventilated patients who were treated for pneumonia with 6 g of temocillin daily for in vitro sensitive pathogens were assigned to either the II (2 g every 8 h over 0.5 h) or the CI (6 g over 24 h after a loading dose of 2 g) group. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed using unbound plasma, and total ELF concentrations of temocillin and related Monte Carlo simulations were performed to assess PTAs. The area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC(0-24)) ELF/plasma penetration ratio was 0.73, at steady state, for both modes of infusion and whatever the level of creatinine clearance. Monte Carlo simulations showed that for the minimal pharmacodynamic (PD) targets of 50% T > 1x MIC (II group) and 100% T > 1x MIC (CI group), PK/PD breakpoints were 4 mg/L in plasma and 2 mg/L in ELF and 4 mg/L in plasma and ELF, respectively. The breakpoint was 8 mg/L in ELF for both modes of infusion in patients with creatinine clearance (CLCR) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2). While CI provides better PKPD indexes, the latter remain below available recommendations for systemic infections, except in the case of moderate renal impairment, thereby warranting future clinical studies in order to determine the efficacy of temocillin in severe pneumonia. The objective of this article is to describe the population pharmacokinetics (PK) of temocillin administered via continuous infusion (CI) versus intermittent infusion (II) in critically ill patients with pneumonia. Secondary objectives included characterization of epithelial lining fluid (ELF)/plasma penetration ratios and determination of the probability of target attainment (PTA) for a range of MICs. Thirty-two mechanically ventilated patients who were treated for pneumonia with 6 g of temocillin daily for in vitro sensitive pathogens were assigned to either the II (2 g every 8 h over 0.5 h) or the CI (6 g over 24 h after a loading dose of 2 g) group.

Automated summary

This article describes the population pharmacokinetics of temocillin administered via continuous infusion versus intermittent infusion in critically ill patients with pneumonia. The study also examines the penetration ratios of the drug in the epithelial lining fluid/plasma and determines the probability of achieving target concentrations for a range of MICs. The results show that continuous infusion provides better PK/PD indexes but still falls below recommended doses for systemic infections, unless the patient has moderate renal impairment.