4.3 Article

Second-look Surgery Detects Low Volume Recurrent Disease Following Cytoreductive Surgery for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis

Journal

ANTICANCER RESEARCH
Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages 1001-1006

Publisher

INT INST ANTICANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.15560

Keywords

Second-look surgery; stoma-reversal; peritonectomy; cytoreductive surgery; heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy; peritoneal carcinomatosis; appendiceal; colorectal; completeness of cytoreduction; peritoneal cancer index

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study retrospectively analyzed the data of 35 patients who underwent stoma reversal and found that second-look surgery can detect early recurrence of peritoneal carcinomatosis and serve as a safe alternative screening method.
Background/Aim: Formation of stoma during cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is often performed to reduce the risk of anastomotic leak. Subsequent stoma reversal provides a unique opportunity for second-look surgery to detect early peritoneal recurrence. Current surveillance methods often fail to detect disease early, including imaging and biochemical markers. In our study, we examined the safety and efficacy of second-look surgery for detection and treatment of disease recurrence. Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 35 patients undergoing stoma reversal from 2015 to 2019 with negative pre-operative imaging. Results: A total of 37% of cases had disease recurrence, with a median peritoneal cancer index of 4. Complete cytoreduction was achieved in all patients. The majority of patients (77%) suffered minor complications only. Median length of hospital stay was 12 days. Conclusion: Second-look surgery detects early disease recurrence and is a safe alternative to conventional screening methods post primary CRS/HIPEC for PC. Long-term, routine second-look surgery can improve survival.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available