4.6 Review

Temporal and Spatial Signaling Mediating the Balance of the Plankton Microbiome

Journal

ANNUAL REVIEW OF MARINE SCIENCE
Volume 14, Issue -, Pages 239-260

Publisher

ANNUAL REVIEWS
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-marine-042021-012353

Keywords

phytoplankton; plankton microbiome; algal bloom; chemical signaling; scale; microbial community dynamics

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft under Germany's Excellence Strategy [EXC 2051, 081021-42]
  2. Max Planck Society

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The annual patterns of plankton succession in the ocean determine ecological and biogeochemical cycles, and the interplay between photosynthetic eukaryotes and microbiota balances the composition of aquatic planktonic ecosystems. Chemical signaling plays a key role in these interactions, influencing species succession and community composition.
The annual patterns of plankton succession in the ocean determine ecological and biogeochemical cycles. The temporally fluctuating interplay between photosynthetic eukaryotes and the associated microbiota balances the composition of aquatic planktonic ecosystems. In addition to nutrients and abiotic factors, chemical signaling determines the outcome of interactions between phytoplankton and their associated microbiomes. Chemical mediators control essential processes, such as the development of key morphological, physiological, behavioral, and life-history traits during algal growth. These molecules thus impact species succession and community composition across time and space in processes that are highlighted in this review. We focus on spatial, seasonal, and physiological dynamics that occur during the early association of algae with bacteria, the exponential growth of a bloom, and its decline and recycling. We also discuss how patterns from field data and global surveys might be linked to the actions of metabolic markers in natural phytoplankton assemblages.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available