4.7 Article

Surgeon Assessment of the Technical Impact of Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy on Operable Stage III Melanoma

Journal

ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages 780-786

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-11112-9

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to assess the impact of neoadjuvant systemic therapies (NST) on the technical aspects of operation for resectable stage III melanoma. Surgeon surveys were conducted to capture key impressions before and after NST, revealing that while many operations were considered more difficult than usual therapeutic lymphadenectomy, surgeries following NST were often perceived as easier compared to baseline impressions. This highlights the potential benefits of engaging surgical oncologists in structured assessments across clinical trials to analyze the effect of NSTs on lymphadenectomy.
Introduction The effect of neoadjuvant systemic therapies (NST) on technical aspects of operation for resectable stage III melanoma is unknown. Prospective capture of the estimated and actual degree of difficulty of therapeutic lymphadenectomy at presentation and after NST may inform the relative merits of NST versus surgery followed by adjuvant therapy. Methods We designed surgeon survey tools to capture key impressions at baseline prior to NST and postoperatively. We conducted a sub-study within a multi-institutional clinical trial for high-risk operable stage III melanoma (NeoACTIVATE, NCT03554083) which enrolls clinically node-positive patients to 12 weeks of combinatorial NST determined by BRAF status. Survey data were analyzed. Results Surveys were completed for 24 of 25 patients (96%). Affected nodal basins were cervical (3, 13%) axillary (9, 38%), inguinal +/- pelvic (14, 58%); 2 (8%) involved >= 2 basins. Baseline estimates included largest affected node size (median/range 4/1.4-11 cm), number of involved nodes (median/range 3/1-10) and tumor fixation (present in 12, 50%). At operation, actual degree of difficulty increased from the baseline estimate in 4 (17%) and decreased in 6 (25%). Surgery was less difficult, average, or more difficult versus usual operation in 4, 9, and 11 cases (17%, 38%, 46%), respectively. Conclusions Although many operations were judged to be more difficult than the usual therapeutic lymphadenectomy, operation following NST was more often perceived as easier than more difficult versus baseline impression. Engaging surgical oncologists to perform similar structured assessments across clinical trials will permit cross-study analysis of the effect of NSTs on the technical conduct of lymphadenectomy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available