4.6 Article

Game and coordination of diverse benefits in smart city PPP projects based on evolutionary game

Journal

ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH
Volume 326, Issue SUPPL 1, Pages 19-19

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10479-021-04290-y

Keywords

Smart city PPP project; Interests game; Coordination of interests; Evolutionary game; Stable equilibrium analysis; Multi-party games

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The intensification of interest conflicts and contradictions in smart city PPP projects requires effective interest coordination and integration. The Tripartite evolutionary game involves dynamic strategy selection and interaction among the three parties. Adjustments in one party's strategy are influenced by the initial strategies of the other two parties, leading to chain reactions with positive or negative effects on other game players. To achieve effective coordination of diverse interests, it is crucial to standardize and constrain multi-subject strategies, ensure incentive compatibility, and guide strategies that benefit project construction.
The intensification of diverse interest conflicts and contradictions in smart city PPP projects requires interest coordination and integration, and the effective construction of interest coordination needs to take the balance of interest games as the premise. The strategy selection of Tripartite evolutionary game is dynamic, and the strategies among the tripartite always interact and influence each other. The adjustment of one party's strategy is subject to the influence of the initial strategies of the other two parties, and the adjustment result of strategy will have a chain reaction, which will have positive or negative effects on other game players. In order to realize the effective coordination of diverse interests, it is necessary to standardize and constrain the multi-subject strategy, realize incentive compatibility, and guide the multi-subject strategy to be beneficial to project construction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available