4.6 Article

New common set of weights method in black-box and two-stage data envelopment analysis

Journal

ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH
Volume 309, Issue 1, Pages 143-162

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10479-021-04304-9

Keywords

DEA; Two-stage; Common set of weights; Efficiency

Ask authors/readers for more resources

DEA analysis aims to evaluate production units under optimal conditions, but flexibility in weight selection may lead to unrealistic results. Treating decision units as a network process can help identify inefficiencies more effectively. This paper introduces a new method for efficiency evaluation and investigates improved models to address multi-objective problems.
Data envelopment analysis (DEA) strives to evaluate the production units under their best conditions. DEA flexibility in selecting the appropriate input/output weights always results in unreal and zero weights. Treating decision-making units (DMUs) as black-box regardless of their internal structures misleads the DEA performance evaluation. While considering units as a network process, it is more likely to identify more inefficiency sources. This paper suggests using a new common set of weights (CSWs) approach to evaluate the units in both black-box and two-stage structures based on a unified criterion. Indeed, our contribution to this line of research is as follows: Firstly, we improve the model proposed by Kao and Hung (J Oper res Soc 56(10): 1196-1203, 2005) to calculate the CSWs in a linear-based optimization model. Secondly, a new CSWs method is suggested in the two-stage network DEA (NDEA) as multiple objectives fractional programming (MOFP) problem. Thirdly, the MOFP problem is converted into a single objective linear programming problem in the two-stage network case. Finally, an enlightening application is presented.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available