4.5 Article

A multiphase MPS method coupling fluid-solid interaction/phase-change models with application to debris remelting in reactor lower plenum

Journal

ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY
Volume 166, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2021.108697

Keywords

MPS method; Severe accident; In-vessel debris remelting; Discrete element method; Speedup algorithm; Local hot spots

Funding

  1. MEXT Quantum Leap Flagship Program (MEXT Q-LEAP) [JPMXS0118067246]
  2. JSPS KAKENHI [19 K15478]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigates the occurrence of local hot spots and RPV breach patterns during debris melting using the MPS method. It is found that large debris blocks may cause severe local hot spots and a lower breach point, while high decay power can result in the migration of local hot spots and limited ablation near the RPV wall.
In a postulated severe accident, the in-vessel debris remelting may result in severe local hot spots, probably threatening the reactor pressure vessel (RPV). The moving particle semi-implicit (MPS) method has great potential for simulating such complicated phenomena. To simulate debris remelting, the models for fluid-solid interactions and solid-solid collisions are coupled into an improved MPS method. A new speedup algorithm that can consider the flow and heat-transfer simulations separately is proposed to handle the multi-time-scale problem in debris remelting. The influence of debris size and decay heat power on the occurrence of local hot spots and RPV breach patterns during debris melting was investigated. It is found that (1) large debris blocks tended to result in severe local hot spots probably causing a lower breach point and (2) high decay power might cause the migration of local hot spots probably producing limited ablation to the vicinity of the RPV wall. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available