4.5 Article

Effects of ATF cladding properties on PWR responses to an SBO accident: A sensitivity analysis

Journal

ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY
Volume 165, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2021.108784

Keywords

ATF cladding; STSBO; MAAP code; Sensitivity analysis; Enthalpy; Hot leg rupture

Funding

  1. Khalifa University
  2. ENEC (Emirates Nuclear Energy Corporation)
  3. NAWAH Energy Company
  4. UAE Ministry of Education (CRPG-2019) [1570604539]
  5. Abu Dhabi Department of Education and Knowledge [AARE2019-081]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigated the effects of ATF cladding properties on plant responses to severe accidents through simulations and sensitivity analyses. The results showed that a large enthalpy of cladding could delay the increase in temperatures of fuel and cladding, resulting in delayed hot leg rupture.
To investigate the effects of ATF cladding properties on the plant responses to severe accidents, shortterm station blackout simulations and sensitivity analyses on hypothetical cladding materials were performed using MAAP code. For sensitivity analyses, 7 hypothetical cladding materials were used. Hypo-0 was the reference cladding whose properties are anticipated to show the poorest fuel performance during an STSBO. The input property values for Hypo-1 through Hypo-6 were selected by changing each variable independently while keeping the others at their reference values. The onset times for core uncovery and cladding oxidation were similar for all the simulation cases, implying that single property cannot affect the event times. A main conclusion is that a large enthalpy of cladding can delay the increase in temperatures of fuel and cladding by playing a role as a heat sink after the core uncovery occurs, resulting in the delayed hot leg rupture. (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available