4.7 Letter

Race/Ethnicity Trends Among US Internal Medicine Residency Applicants and Matriculants: A Cross-Sectional Study

Journal

ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 175, Issue 4, Pages 611-614

Publisher

AMER COLL PHYSICIANS
DOI: 10.7326/M21-3287

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to explore the representation of underrepresented in medicine (UIM) internal medicine residency applicants and matriculants. The study found that there has been a slight increase in the proportion of UIM applicants and matriculants in recent years, with a more significant increase observed among Black and Hispanic/Latino applicants.
Background: Previous research has detailed the impor-tance of a racially and ethnically diverse physician workforce in improving access to care, communication, patient satisfaction, and health outcomes, particularly for underserved and systemi-cally marginalized patients (1). Despite this need, disparities in representation within medicine, including internal medicine (IM), persist. Many identities fall under the umbrella of diversity; here, references to diversity pertain to race/ethnicity. Objective: To elucidate trends in representation for IM resi-dency applicants and matriculants who identify as underrepre-sented in medicine (UIM). Methods and Findings: Data about applicants and matriculants to Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education IM resi-dency programs between July 2010 and July 2018 were acquired from the Association of American Medical Colleges. Institutional review board review was not required for the deidentified, publicly available data. Analysis was performed using Prism (version 9.2.0; GraphPad Software) and Excel (version 16.43; Microsoft). Between 2010 and 2018, a total of 214656 unique persons applied to IM residency programs and 87489 matriculated; 28222 of the applicants (13.2%) and 9269 of the matriculants (10.6%) identified as a UIM race/ethnicity (Figure, A). The proportion of aggregate UIM applicants grew minimally but significantly (slope, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.29 to 0.39]; Figure, B). On stratified analysis, a statistically significant increase was seen only for applicants who were Black or African American (slope, 0.11 [CI, 0.05 to 0.17]) and those who were Hispanic, Latino, or of Spanish origin (slope, 0.22 [CI, 0.15 to 0.29]). Trends for the proportion of aggregate UIM matriculants similarly had minimal but significant growth (slope, 0.11 [CI, 0.02 to 0.20]; Figure, C). In examining disaggregated UIM matriculant data, only the proportion of matriculants who were Hispanic, Latino, or of Spanish origin significantly changed (slope, 0.13 [CI, 0.05 to 0.21]).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available