4.4 Article

Allergic reactions to coronavirus disease 2019 vaccines and addressing vaccine hesitancy

Journal

ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 128, Issue 2, Pages 161-+

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2021.10.019

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reports on the workflow established at the institution for evaluating allergic reactions to COVID-19 vaccines and summarizes the types and frequency of adverse reactions. The results show that most vaccine reactions occurred in women, with respiratory allergies predominantly observed in women with a history of allergies and asthma. Furthermore, a higher incidence of dermatological reactions was observed in men. Overall, most individuals who reacted to the initial vaccine dose could safely tolerate the second dose, and intradermal PEG testing had limited utility for evaluating allergic reactions to mRNA vaccines.
Background: Allergic and nonallergic adverse reactions have been reported with global coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination. It was previously hypothesized that polyethylene glycol (PEG) may be responsible for anaphylactic reactions to messenger RNA (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccines. Objective: To report the workflow established at our institution, types, and frequency of adverse reactions to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in patients presenting for allergy evaluation. Methods: A COVID-19 vaccine adverse reaction registry was established. We used PEG prick skin testing, followed by PEG challenges in selected cases, to ensure PEG tolerance and encourage completion of COVID-19 vaccination series. Results: A total of 113 patients were included. Most vaccine reactions (86.7%) occurred in women. Anaphylaxis occurred only in women, all of which had a history of allergic disease and two-thirds had asthma. Anaphylaxis rate was 40.6 cases permillion. None of the anaphylactic cases developed hypotension, required intubation, or required hospital admission. Systemic allergic symptoms, not fulfilling anaphylaxis criteria, were significantly more common in Pfizer-BioNTech than Moderna-vaccinated patients (P = .02). We observed a higher incidence of dermatologic nonurticarial reactions in men (P = .004). Among first-dose reactors, 86.7% received and tolerated the second dose. We observed a high rate of false-positive intradermal skin test results and frequent subjective symptoms with oral PEG challenge. Conclusion: Intradermal PEG testing has limited utility in evaluating anaphylaxis to mRNA vaccines. Most severe postvaccination allergic symptoms are not caused by hypersensitivity to PEG. Most people with reaction to the initial mRNA vaccine can be safely revaccinated. Patients with anaphylaxis to COVID-19 vaccines benefit from physician-observed vaccination. (C) 2021 American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available