4.6 Article

Transcriptomic analysis reveals that non-forage or forage fiber source promotes rumen development through different metabolic processes in lambs

Journal

ANIMAL BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages 1058-1071

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10495398.2021.2011738

Keywords

Fiber source; lamb; starter; rumen development; transcriptomic

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the effects of non-forage and forage as dietary fiber sources on rumen development and found that non-forage fiber improved immune function and nitrogen utilization, while forage promoted rumen morphological development.
Dietary fiber supplementation can stimulate rumen development in lambs during the pre-weaning period. However, it is unclear whether different sources of fiber have varying effects on rumen development. This study aimed to investigate the molecular mechanism of rumen morphological and functional development based on non-forage or forage as a starter dietary fiber source. Twenty-four male Hu lambs with similar body weights (BW, 3.67 +/- 0.08 kg) were selected and divided into two groups that received diets supplemented with either alfalfa hay (AH) or soybean hull (SH). At the age of 70 days, six lambs were slaughtered from each treatment group for rumen fermentation and morphological analyses. Three samples of the rumen tissue from the ventral sac were collected for transcriptomic analysis. The results identified 633 differentially expressed genes (DEGs), of which 210 were upregulated and 423 were downregulated in the SH group compared with those in the AH group. The upregulated DEGs were most enriched in the immune function and proteolysis pathways, whereas the downregulated DEGs were mainly involved in cell proliferation, apoptosis, and differentiation pathways. These findings indicated that non-forage as a starter dietary fiber source improved immune function and enhanced nitrogen utilization, whereas forage facilitated rumen morphological development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available