4.6 Review

Knee kinematics and joint moments during gait following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
Volume 50, Issue 10, Pages 597-U54

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094797

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia) Postgraduate Scholarship [813021]
  2. Australian Postgraduate Award Scholarship
  3. NHMRC (Australia) Research Training (Post-Doctoral) Fellowship [628918]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Abnormal gait after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) may contribute to development and/or progression of knee osteoarthritis. Objective To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of knee kinematics and joint moments during walking after ACLR. Methods We searched seven electronic databases and reference lists of relevant papers, for cross-sectional, human-based observational studies comparing knee joint kinematics and moments during level walking in individuals with ACLR, with the uninjured contralateral knee or healthy individuals as a control. Two independent reviewers appraised methodological quality (modified Downs and Black scale). Where possible, data were pooled by time post-ACLR (RevMan), otherwise narrative synthesis was undertaken. Results Thirty-four studies were included. Meta-analysis revealed significant sagittal plane deficits in ACLR knees. We found greater knee flexion angles (standardised mean difference: 1.06; 95% CI 0.39 to 1.74) and joint moments (1.61; 0.87 to 2.35) <6 months post-ACLR, compared to healthy controls. However, lower peak knee flexion angles were identified 1-3 years (-2.21; -3.16 to -1.26) and >= 3 years post-ACLR (-1.38, -2.14 to -0.62), and lower knee flexion moment 6-12 months post-ACLR (-0.76; -1.40 to -0.12). Pooled data provided strong evidence of no difference in peak knee adduction moment >3 years after ACLR (vs healthy controls) (0.09; -0.63 to 0.81). No transverse plane conclusions could be drawn. Conclusions Sagittal plane biomechanics, rather than the knee adduction moment, appear to be more relevant post-ACLR. Better understanding of sagittal plane biomechanics is necessary for optimal post-operative recovery, and to potentially prevent early onset and progression of knee OA after ACLR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available