4.3 Article

Quantitative 1H NMR for the Direct Quantification of Saikosaponins in Bupleurum chinense DC.

Journal

ANALYTICAL SCIENCES
Volume 37, Issue 10, Pages 1413-1418

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.2116/analsci.20P462

Keywords

Bupleurum chinense DC; quantitative H-1 NMR; molality; saikosaponin; quality evaluation

Funding

  1. Basal Research Fund of Henan Academy of Sciences [210602006]
  2. Science-Technology Foundation for Outstanding Young Scientists of Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences [2018YQ22]
  3. Province Foundation for Science Innovation Distinguished Young Scholars of Henan Province [184100510015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A quantitative proton nuclear magnetic resonance method was developed for the evaluation of saikosaponins in Bupleurum, showing potential as a reliable quality assessment technique.
Saikosaponin a and saikosaponin d are used as chemical standards for the quality evaluation of Bupleurum chinense DC. by the high-performance liquid chromatography method in current Chinese Pharmacopoeia. However, other saikosaponins, such as saikosaponin c and saikosaponin b(2), also possess pharmaceutical activity, but are not used as chemical standards. In this study, a quantitative proton nuclear magnetic resonance (H-1 NMR) method was developed to determine the total mass percentage (mg/g) of SSa, SSb1, SSb2 and SSd in B. chinense DC., using the H-24 (delta(H) 0.71) signal. Furthermore, the molality (mol/kg) of type I saikosaponins (epoxy-ether structure) was also determined by quantitative H-1 NMR in the area of H-11 (delta(H) 5.95) for a more accurate quality evaluation. Validation of the method confirmed that it has acceptable selectivity, precision, stability, and repeatability. The results indicated that this method has the potential to be a reliable method for the quantification of saikosaponins in Bupleurum scorzonerifolium Willd., vinegar baked B. chinense DC. and B. scorzonerifolium Willd., Chaihu Koufuye (oral liquid of Chaihu).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available