4.6 Article

Sensitive detection of the okadaic acid marine toxin in shellfish by Au@Pt NPs/horseradish peroxidase dual catalysis immunoassay

Journal

ANALYTICAL METHODS
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages 1261-1267

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1ay01973b

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key Technologies R&D Program of China [2018YFC1602902]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A sensitive colorimetric immunoassay was developed for trace detection of the marine toxin okadaic acid (OA) using Au@Pt nanoparticles and horseradish peroxidase (HRP). The method showed improved sensitivity and good recovery rates in shellfish samples.
Based on the catalysis enhancement strategy of Au@Pt nanoparticles (Au@Pt NPs) and horseradish peroxidase (HRP) related to the TMB-H2O2 indicator, a sensitive colorimetric immunoassay was established for trace okadaic acid (OA) detection. The anti-OA monoclonal antibody (McAb) with a high K-aff constant was prepared and modified on Au@Pt NPs. Through grafting the HRP conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG antibody (IgG) on Au@Pt/McAb, bifunctional composites with Au@Pt-Ab and HRP were prepared and adopted. Characteristics including morphology, specificity and catalytic performance were evaluated. Under the optimal conditions, the sensitivity of the resultant enzyme immunoassay was significantly improved, and a low limit of detection (LOD) of OA was achieved at 0.04 ng mL(-1) (equivalent to 0.6 mu g kg(-1) in mussel tissue), which was better than that of most HRP or Au/HRP enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. When applied to fortified shellfish samples (e.g. oysters, mussels and clams), the recoveries ranging from 98.3 +/- 2.3% to 106.0 +/- 9.0% were acceptable and comparable with those of the LC-MS method. Acceptable precision was achieved with a variation coefficient (CV) of 2.3-8.4%. The method provides a promising alternative for the highly sensitive detection of the OA marine toxin at trace levels.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available