4.8 Article

Characterization of In Vivo Protein Complexes via Chemical Cross-Linking and Mass Spectrometry

Journal

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 94, Issue 3, Pages 1537-1542

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c02410

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute
  2. Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC) [U24CA210985]
  3. Early Detection Research Network (EDRN) [U01CA152813]
  4. [R01GM074830]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study introduces a method to preserve protein complexes by in vivo cross-linking, followed by size exclusion chromatography and data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry, enabling the characterization of in vivo protein complexes from cells or tissues to determine their clinical importance. This approach can identify protein complexes not detected by the in vitro system, providing unique insights into protein functions.
Cells perform various functions by proteins via protein complexes. Characterization of protein complexes is critical to understanding their biological and clinical significance and has been one of the major efforts of functional proteomics. To date, most protein complexes are characterized by the in vitro system from protein extracts after the cells or tissues are lysed, and it has been challenging to determine which of these protein complexes are formed in intact cells. Herein, we report an approach to preserve protein complexes using in vivo cross-linking, followed by size exclusion chromatography and data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry. This approach enables the characterization of in vivo protein complexes from cells or tissues, which allows the determination of protein complexes in clinical research. More importantly, the described approach can identify protein complexes that are not detected by the in vitro system, which provide unique protein function information.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available