4.7 Article

Simultaneous-Source Separation Using Iterative Seislet-Frame Thresholding

Journal

IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages 197-201

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LGRS.2015.2505319

Keywords

Deblending; distance-separated simultaneous-source data; iterative inversion; seislet frame; seislet transform

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41274137]
  2. National Science and Technology of Major Projects of China [2011ZX05019-006]
  3. National Engineering Laboratory of Offshore Oil Exploration

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The distance-separated simultaneous-sourcing (DSSS) technique can make the smallest interference between different sources. In a distance-separated simultaneous-source acquisition with two sources, we propose the use of a novel iterative seislet-frame thresholding approach to separate the blended data. Because the separation is implemented in common shot gathers, there is no need for the random scheduling that is used in conventional simultaneous-source acquisition, where random scheduling is applied to ensure the incoherent property of blending noise in common midpoint, common receiver, or common offset gathers. Thus, DSSS becomes more flexible. The separation is based on the assumption that the local dips of the data from different sources are different. We can use the plane-wave destruction algorithm to simultaneously estimate the conflicting dips and then use seislet frames with two corresponding local dips to sparsify each signal component. Then, the different signal components can be easily separated. Compared with the FK-based approach, the proposed seislet-frame-based approach has the potential to obtain better separated components with less artifacts because the seislet frames are local transforms while the Fourier transform is a global transform. Both simulated synthetic and field data examples show very successful performance of the proposed approach.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available