4.5 Article

Clear Cell Carcinoma (CCC) of the Cervix Is a Human Papillomavirus (HPV)-independent Tumor Associated With Poor Outcome A Comprehensive Analysis of 58 Cases

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY
Volume 46, Issue 6, Pages 765-773

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001863

Keywords

clear cell carcinoma; gastric type; cervix; stage; prognosis

Funding

  1. NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant [P30 CA008748]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cervical clear cell carcinoma (CCC) is a rare human papillomavirus-independent adenocarcinoma. Studies found that the overall survival and recurrence-free survival of CCC showed no significant difference compared to gastric-type adenocarcinoma (GTA), but significant differences compared to human papillomavirus-associated endocervical adenocarcinoma (HPVA ECA). Treatment significantly influences the recurrence-free survival of CCC, but is not an independent prognostic factor.
Cervical clear cell carcinoma (CCC) is a rare human papillomavirus-independent adenocarcinoma. While recent studies have focused on gastric-type endocervical adenocarcinoma (GTA), little is known about CCC. A total of 58 (CCCs) were collected from 14 international institutions and retrospectively analyzed using univariable and multivariable methods and compared with 36 gastric-type adenocarcinomas and 173 human papillomavirus-associated (HPVA) endocervical adenocarcinoma (ECA) regarding overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Most cases were FIGO stage I (72.4%), with Silva C pattern of invasion (77.6%), and the majority were treated with radical surgery (84.5%) and adjuvant therapy (55.2%). Lymphovascular invasion was present in 31%, while lymph node metastasis was seen in 24.1%; 10.3% were associated with abdominopelvic metastases at the time of diagnosis; 32.8% had recurrences, and 19% died of disease. We did not find statistically significant differences in OS and RFS between CCC and GTA at 5 and 10 years (P=0.313 and 0.508, respectively), but there were significant differences in both OS and RFS between CCC and HPVA ECA (P=0.003 and 0.032, respectively). Also, OS and RFS in stage I clear cell and GTA were similar (P=0.632 and 0.692, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that OS is influenced by the presence of recurrence (P=0.009), while RFS is influenced by the FIGO stage (P=0.025). Cervical CCC has poorer outcomes than HPVA ECA and similar outcomes to human papillomavirus-independent GTA. Oncologic treatment significantly influences RFS in univariate analysis but is not an independent prognostic factor in multivariate analysis suggesting that alternative therapies should be investigated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available