4.7 Article

An All-Oral 6-Month Regimen for Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial (the NExT Study)

Journal

Publisher

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202107-1779OC

Keywords

drug-resistant tuberculosis; all-oral regimen; shortened regimen; bedaquiline; linezolid

Funding

  1. South African Medical Research Council [MRC-RFA-UFSP-01-2013/NEXT-RCT]
  2. Pfizer
  3. European and Developing Country Clinical Trials Partnership [TMA 2015-CDF-1052]
  4. Wellcome Trust [MR/S027777/1]
  5. Medical Research Council [MR/S03563X/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study explored the effectiveness of a new all-oral regimen compared to a standard injectable-based regimen for the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis. The all-oral regimen showed significantly improved treatment outcomes but had a higher incidence of drug toxicity. These findings provide important insights for the development of future treatment regimens for drug-resistant tuberculosis.
Rationale: Improving treatment outcomes while reducing drug toxicity and shortening the treatment duration to similar to 6 months remains an aspirational goal for the treatment of multidrug-resistant/rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB). Objectives: To conduct a multicenter randomized controlled trial in adults with MDR/RR-TB (i.e., without resistance to fluoroquinolones or aminoglycosides). Methods: Participants were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to a similar to 6-month all-oral regimen that included levofloxacin, bedaquiline, and linezolid, or the standard-of-care (SOC) >= 9-month World Health Organization (WHO)-approved injectable-based regimen. The primary endpoint was a favorable WHO-defined treatment outcome (which mandates that prespecified drug substitution is counted as an unfavorable outcome) 24 months after treatment initiation. The trial was stopped prematurely when bedaquiline-based therapy became the standard of care in South Africa. Measurements and Main Results: In total, 93 of 111 randomized participants (44 in the comparator arm and 49 in the interventional arm) were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis; 51 (55%) were HIV coinfected (median CD4 count, 158 cells/ml). Participants in the intervention arm were 2.2 times more likely to experience a favorable 24-month outcome than participants in the SOC arm (51% [25 of 49] vs. 22.7% [10 of 44]; risk ratio, 2.2 [1.2-4.1]; P= 0.006}. Toxicity-related drug substitution occurred more frequently in the SOC arm (65.9% [29 of 44] vs. 34.7% [17 of 49]; P= 0.001)], 82.8% (24 of 29) owing to kanamycin (mainly hearing loss; replaced by bedaquiline) in the SOC arm, and 64.7% (11 of 17) owing to linezolid (mainly anemia) in the interventional arm. Adverse event-related treatment discontinuation in the safety population was more common in the SOC arm (56.4% [31 of 55] vs. 32.1% [17 of 56]; P= 0.007). However, grade 3 adverse events were more common in the interventional arm (55.4% [31 of 56] vs. 32.7 [18 of 55]; P = 0.022). Culture conversion was significantly better in the intervention arm (hazard ratio, 2.6 [1.4-4.9]; P = 0.003) after censoring those with bedaquiline replacement in the SOC arm (and this pattern remained consistent after censoring for drug replacement in both arms; P= 0.01). Conclusions: Compared with traditional injectable-containing regimens, an all-oral 6-month levofloxacin, bedaquiline, and linezolid-containing MDR/RR-TB regimen was associated with a significantly improved 24-month WHO-defined treatment outcome (predominantly owing to toxicity-related drug substitution). However, drug toxicity occurred frequently in both arms. These findings inform strategies to develop future regimens for MDR/RR-TB.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available