4.2 Article

Three decades of the Human Genome Organization

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A
Volume 185, Issue 11, Pages 3314-3321

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.62512

Keywords

genome biology; Human Genome Organization; HGNC; HGVS; HVP; international

Ask authors/readers for more resources

HUGO was established in 1988 to integrate international genomic activity and accelerate knowledge diffusion from the human genome project. In 2020, HUGO merged with HGVS and HVP to gather human genomic variation worldwide, under a new Executive Board and seven focused committees to bring benefits of genome diversity knowledge to people globally.
The Human Genome Organization (HUGO) was initially established in 1988 to help integrate international scientific genomic activity and to accelerate the diffusion of knowledge from the efforts of the human genome project. Its founding President was Victor McKusick. During the late 1980s and 1990s, HUGO organized lively gene mapping meetings to accurately place genes on the genome as chromosomes were being sequenced. With the completion of the Human Genome Project, HUGO went through some transitions and self-reflection. In 2020, HUGO (which hosts a large annual scientific meeting and comprises the renowned HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee [HGNC], responsible for naming genes, and an outstanding Ethics Committee) was merged with the Human Genome Variation Society (HGVS; which defines the correct nomenclature for variation description) and the Human Variome Project (HVP; championed by the late Richard Cotton) into a single organization that is committed to assembling human genomic variation from all over the world. This consolidated effort, under a new Executive Board and seven focused committees, will facilitate efficient and effective communication and action to bring the benefits of increasing knowledge of genome diversity and biology to people all over the world.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available