4.6 Article

Minimal Change Disease With Severe Acute Kidney Injury Following the Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 Vaccine: A Case Report

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES
Volume 78, Issue 4, Pages 607-610

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.06.008

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This case report describes a patient who developed minimal change disease (MCD) and severe acute kidney injury (AKI) following the Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine. Treatment with glucocorticoids improved kidney function and proteinuria. Further research is needed to determine the association between MCD and COVID-19 vaccination.
We report a case of minimal change disease (MCD) with severe acute kidney injury (AKI) following the first injection of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) vaccine from Oxford-AstraZeneca against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). A 71-year-old man with a history of dyslipidemia and a baseline serum creatinine of 0.7 mg/dL presented with nephrotic syndrome, AKI, and severe hypertension 13 days after receiving the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine. Refractory hyperkalemia and hypervolemia with oligoanuria prompted initiation of hemodialysis. His serum albumin was 2.6 g/dL and his urinary protein-creatinine ratio was 2,321 mg/mmol. Given a high suspicion for rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis, empirical glucocorticoid treatment was initiated (3 methylprednisolone pulses followed by high-dose prednisone). A kidney biopsy showed MCD and acute tubular injury. Kidney function and proteinuria subsequently improved, and hemodialysis was discontinued 38 days after the start of therapy. This case describes de novo MCD after the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine. It adds to the few published case reports of MCD after the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. Further reports and studies will be needed to elucidate whether MCD is truly associated with COVID-19 vaccination.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available