4.5 Article

Implementation of a geriatric emergency medicine assessment team decreases hospital length of stay

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Volume 55, Issue -, Pages 45-50

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.02.027

Keywords

Geriatrics; Geriatric Assessment; Quality Improvement; Cost Savings

Funding

  1. Beaumont Health Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the impact of a Geriatric Emergency Medicine Assessment (GEMA) team on the admission rate and hospital length of stay (LOS) for geriatric patients. The results showed that patients who were assessed by the GEMA team were more likely to be discharged directly from the emergency department (ED), and if admitted, the hospital LOS was reduced by over 24 hours. This suggests that targeted interventions in the ED can help reduce hospital LOS and provide cost savings for geriatric patients.
Background: Patients over the age of 65 who present to the Emergency Department (ED) are more likely to be admitted to the hospital and, if admitted, often have a longer length of stay (LOS) in the hospital than younger patients. Objectives: To determine if assessment and intervention by a Geriatric Emergency Medicine Assessment (GEMA) team would decrease the admission rate and reduce the hospital LOS for admitted geriatric patients. Methods: We conducted a case-control study of the impact of a GEMA team in a large ED. The team screened patients >= 65 years of age for functional decline to determine the need for targeted interventions. Potential interventions included: occupational therapy consultation in the ED, rehabilitation placement, geriatric clinic referral, and delirium management. Our control population was unassessed geriatric ED patients seen in the six months before and after GEMA team implementation. Results: A total of 815 patients were assessed between June and November 2019. Assessed patients were more likely to be discharged from the ED (54% vs 29%, OR 2.06). Mean ED LOS was nineteen minutes longer in assessed patients (4.94 vs 4.62 h, p<0.01). The mean hospital LOS was 25 h less in assessed patients (4.50 vs 5.54 days, p<0.01). Assessed and unassessed patients who were admitted to the hospital had the same baseline health status as measured by the Charlson Comorbidity Index (median score 2, p = 0.087). The reduction in hospital LOS resulted in an estimated savings of $1.7 million per year using the national average cost for 24 h of inpatient care. Conclusion: Patients who were assessed by the GEMA team were more likely to be discharged directly from the ED, and if admitted, hospital LOS was reduced by over 24 h. This indicates that a targeted intervention in the ED can help reduce hospital LOS in geriatric patients and therefore provide cost savings. (C) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available