4.4 Article

Mortality in Pulmonary Embolism According to Risk Category at Presentation in Emergency Department: Impact of Cardiac Arrest

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 157, Issue -, Pages 125-127

Publisher

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.06.029

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stratifying high-risk patients with pulmonary embolism based on whether they had cardiac arrest can refine risk assessment. Mortality increased with age in high-risk patients without cardiac arrest, while it was not age-related in high-risk patients with cardiac arrest.
In this investigation we explore whether assessment of the risk of mortality can be refined by stratifying high-risk patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) according to whether they had cardiac arrest. We stratified high-risk patients according to whether they had shock but no cardiac arrest, or cardiac arrest diagnosed in the emergency department (ED). This was a retrospective cohort study based on administrative data from the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS), 2016. Included patients were 274,227 who were admitted to the same hospital as the ED or died in the ED. This was 77% of 354,616 patients with pulmonary embolism seen in the ED in 2016. Patients were identified based on International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) Codes. High-risk with no cardiac arrest were 4,317 of 274,227 (1.6%) and high-risk with cardiac arrest were 1,027 of 274,227 (0.4%). Mortality of high-risk patients who did not have cardiac arrest was 1,753 of 4,317 (41%). Mortality of high-risk patients who had cardiac arrest was 754 of 1027 (74%). Mortality increased with age in high-risk patients who did not have cardiac arrest, but mortality was not age-related in high-risk patients with cardiac arrest. In conclusion, high-risk patients with PE are a heterogeneous group and stratification according to whether they had cardiac arrest refines risk assessment. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available