Journal
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY
Volume 108, Issue 11, Pages 2196-2207Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajb2.1764
Keywords
Apis mellifera; bee; crop pollination; honeybee; pollen deposition; pollination efficiency; pollinator importance; visitation frequency; wild pollinator
Categories
Funding
- U.S. Department of Defense National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate (NDSEG) Fellowship
- USDA-ARS Non-Assistance Cooperative Agreement [58-2030-8-031]
- National Science Foundation (NSF) Graduate Research Fellowships
- NSF [DEB 1556885]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The study found that honeybees are significantly less effective than the most effective non-honeybee pollinators but are as effective as the average pollinator. The effectiveness of honeybees is moderated by the type of pollinator, showing lower effectiveness compared to the most effective and average bird and bee pollinators but similar effectiveness to other taxa. Visitation frequency and pollination effectiveness are positively correlated, with this trend being largely influenced by data from communities where honeybees were absent.
Premise Many animals provide ecosystem services in the form of pollination including honeybees, which have become globally dominant floral visitors. A rich literature documents considerable variation in single visit pollination effectiveness, but this literature has yet to be extensively synthesized to address whether honeybees are effective pollinators. Methods We conducted a hierarchical meta-analysis of 168 studies and extracted 1564 single visit effectiveness (SVE) measures for 240 plant species. We paired SVE data with visitation frequency data for 69 of these studies. We used these data to ask three questions: (1) Do honeybees (Apis mellifera) and other floral visitors differ in their SVE? (2) To what extent do plant and pollinator attributes predict differences in SVE between honeybees and other visitors? (3) Is there a correlation between visitation frequency and SVE? Results Honeybees were significantly less effective than the most effective non-honeybee pollinators but were as effective as the average pollinator. The type of pollinator moderated these effects. Honeybees were less effective compared to the most effective and average bird and bee pollinators but were as effective as other taxa. Visitation frequency and SVE were positively correlated, but this trend was largely driven by data from communities where honeybees were absent. Conclusions Although high visitation frequencies make honeybees important pollinators, they were less effective than the average bee and rarely the most effective pollinator of the plants they visit. As such, honeybees may be imperfect substitutes for the loss of wild pollinators, and safeguarding pollination will benefit from conservation of non-honeybee taxa.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available