4.7 Article

Wi-Fi Fingerprint-Based Indoor Positioning: Recent Advances and Comparisons

Journal

IEEE COMMUNICATIONS SURVEYS AND TUTORIALS
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages 466-490

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/COMST.2015.2464084

Keywords

Indoor localization; Wi-Fi fingerprinting; localization techniques; system deployment; recent progresses and comparisons

Funding

  1. Hong Kong RAMP
  2. D Center for Logistics and Supply Chain Management Enabling Technologies [ITP/034/12LP]
  3. Hong Kong Research Grant Council (RGC) General Research Fund [610713]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The growing commercial interest in indoor location-based services (ILBS) has spurred recent development of many indoor positioning techniques. Due to the absence of global positioning system (GPS) signal, many other signals have been proposed for indoor usage. Among them, Wi-Fi (802.11) emerges as a promising one due to the pervasive deployment of wireless LANs (WLANs). In particular, Wi-Fi fingerprinting has been attracting much attention recently because it does not require line-of-sight measurement of access points (APs) and achieves high applicability in complex indoor environment. This survey overviews recent advances on two major areas of Wi-Fi fingerprint localization: advanced localization techniques and efficient system deployment. Regarding advanced techniques to localize users, we present how to make use of temporal or spatial signal patterns, user collaboration, and motion sensors. Regarding efficient system deployment, we discuss recent advances on reducing offline labor-intensive survey, adapting to fingerprint changes, calibrating heterogeneous devices for signal collection, and achieving energy efficiency for smartphones. We study and compare the approaches through our deployment experiences, and discuss some future directions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available