4.4 Article

Results of a cluster randomized trial testing the systems analysis and improvement approach to increase HIV testing in family planning clinics

Journal

AIDS
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages 225-235

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000003099

Keywords

family planning clinics; HIV counseling and testing; implementation science; systems analysis and improvement approach

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health/National Institute for Child Health and Human Development [K24-HD88229]
  2. STD and AIDS Research and Training Program [T32 AI07140, K08CA228761]
  3. University of Washington/Fred Hutch Center for AIDS Research, an NIH [AI027757]
  4. NIH Institutes and Center: NIAID
  5. NIH Institutes and Center: NIMH
  6. NIH Institutes and Center: NHLBI
  7. NIH Institutes and Center: NIA
  8. NIH Institutes and Center: NIGMS
  9. NIH Institutes and Center: NIDDK
  10. NIH Institutes and Center: NCI
  11. NIH Institutes and Center: NIDA
  12. NIH Institutes and Center: NICHD

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to test the effectiveness of the Systems Analysis and Improvement Approach (SAIA) in increasing rates of HIV testing and counseling in family planning clinics in Mombasa, Kenya. By implementing SAIA cycles and analyzing the data, the study found that SAIA significantly increased the proportion of new family planning clients tested and counseled for HIV. This suggests that integrating routine HIV testing into family planning clinics could contribute to achieving the UNAIDS goal of increasing awareness of HIV status.
Objective: The aim of this study was to test an implementation strategy, the Systems Analysis and Improvement Approach (SAIA), to increase rates of HIV testing and counseling (HTC) in family planning clinics in Mombasa, Kenya. Design: A cluster randomized trial. Methods: Twenty-four family planning clinics were randomized 1 : 1 to implementing SAIA versus usual procedures. Study staff implemented monthly SAIA cycles with family planning clinic staff for 12 months. SAIA has five steps. Step 1 uses a cascade analysis' tool to quantify the number of individuals who complete each step of a process. Step 2 involves sequential process flow mapping to identify modifiable bottlenecks in the system. Step 3 develops and implements workflow modifications to address bottlenecks. Step 4 assesses impact of the modification by recalculating the cascade analysis. Step 5 repeats the cycle. The primary outcome was the proportion of new family planning clients tested for HIV during the last quarter of the trial. Results: During the last 3 months of the trial, 85% (740/868) of new family planning clients were counseled for HIV in intervention clinics compared with 67% (1036/1542) in control clinics (prevalence rate ratio [PRR] 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-1.30). Forty-two percent (364/859) of family planning clients were tested for HIV at intervention clinics compared with 32% (485/1521) at control clinics (PRR 1.33, 95% CI 1.16-1.52). Conclusion: SAIA led to a significant increase in HIV testing in family planning clinics in Mombasa. Integrating routine HTC into family planning clinics is a promising strategy to achieve the UNAIDS goal of 95% of people living with HIV being aware of their status.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available