4.4 Article

Anal cancer incidence in men with HIV who have sex with men: are black men at higher risk?

Journal

AIDS
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages 657-664

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000003151

Keywords

AIDS; anal cancer; HIV; men who have sex with men; racial disparities

Funding

  1. AIDS Clinical Trial Group (ACTG) [7UM1Al068636-07]
  2. NIH [R24 AI067039]
  3. University of Alabama at Birmingham [P30 AI027767]
  4. University of Washington [P30 AI027757]
  5. University of California San Diego [P30 AI036214]
  6. University of California San Francisco [P30 AI027763]
  7. Case Western Reserve University [P30 AI036219]
  8. Johns Hopkins University [P30 AI094189, U01 DA036935]
  9. Fenway Health/Harvard [P30 AI060354]
  10. University of North Carolina Chapel Hill [P30 AI50410]
  11. [U01 AI069918]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This clinical cohort study found that Black MSM were at significantly increased risk for anal cancer compared to non-Black MSM. Further studies are necessary to evaluate factors impacting anal cancer incidence and outcomes in Black men with HIV.
Objective: To assess differences in anal cancer incidence between racial/ethnic groups among a clinical cohort of men with HIV who have sex with men. Design: Clinical cohort study Methods: We studied men who have sex with men (MSM) in the Centers for AIDS Research Network of Integrated Clinical Systems (CNICS) who initiated antiretroviral therapy (ART) under HIV care in CNICS. We compared anal cancer incidence between Black and non-Black men and calculated hazard ratios controlling for demographic characteristics (age, CNICS site, year of ART initiation), HIV disease indicators (nadir CD4(+), peak HIV RNA), and co-infection/behavioral factors including hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), tobacco smoking and alcohol abuse. Results: We studied 7473 MSM with HIV who contributed 41 810 person-years of follow-up after initiating ART between 1996 and 2014 in CNICS. Forty-one individuals had an incident diagnosis of anal cancer under observation. Crude rates of anal cancer were 204 versus 61 per 100 000 person-years among Black versus non-Black MSM. The weighted hazard ratio for anal cancer in Black MSM (adjusting for demographics, HIV disease factors, and co-infection/behavioral factors) was 2.37 (95% confidence interval: 1.17, 4.82) compared to non-Black MSM. Conclusions: In this large multicenter cohort, Black MSM were at significantly increased risk for anal cancer compared to non-Black MSM. Further detailed studies evaluating factors impacting anal cancer incidence and outcomes in Black men with HIV are necessary. Inclusion of more diverse study cohorts may elucidate modifiable factors associated with increased anal cancer risk experienced by Black MSM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available