4.5 Article

Development of Axial Flows in Wake Vortices due to End Effects

Journal

AIAA JOURNAL
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST AERONAUTICS ASTRONAUTICS
DOI: 10.2514/1.J060577

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation [GR 3524/9-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Experiments were conducted in a towing tank to study the behavior of wake vortices after the landing of an aircraft. Different flow patterns in the wake vortex cores and their effects were observed, including wakelike and jetlike axial flows. The disturbances and their spatial-temporal behavior, including propagation velocities, were presented and discussed.
Experiments on the behavior of wake vortices after the end of lift production (end effects) are conducted in a towing tank. The experiments are a first step toward investigating the behavior of the wake vortices after the landing of an aircraft. The model used for the experiments is the DLR, German Aerospace Center F13, well known from previous investigations. After a straight translation at a constant speed, the F13 model in only wing configuration is decelerated at a constant rate to a complete stop to cease the lift production. After the beginning of the deceleration and the halt of the wing, two different disturbances are observed that travel through the cores of the wake vortices. These disturbances and their influence on tangential and axial flows in the wake vortices are investigated using conventional 2-D and stereo particle image velocimetry setups. First, wakelike axial flow is observed in the vortex core, then switching to jetlike axial flow, initiated by the first of the two disturbances (vortex bursting). After the first disturbance, the jetlike flow prevails and increases in magnitude until the second disturbance arrives (helical-like). The spatial-temporal behavior of the disturbances, including their propagation velocities, is presented and discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available