4.7 Review

Sex-specific aging in animals: Perspective and future directions

Journal

AGING CELL
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/acel.13542

Keywords

aging; comparative biology; lifespan; mortality; sex differences

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (US) [2021305]
  2. Div Of Biological Infrastructure
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences [2021305] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sex differences in aging, including lifespan, age-associated decline, and physiological markers, vary greatly across animal species. The underlying causes of these differences remain mostly unknown, highlighting the need for further research on the role of sex-determination mechanisms and their impact on aging.
Sex differences in aging occur in many animal species, and they include sex differences in lifespan, in the onset and progression of age-associated decline, and in physiological and molecular markers of aging. Sex differences in aging vary greatly across the animal kingdom. For example, there are species with longer-lived females, species where males live longer, and species lacking sex differences in lifespan. The underlying causes of sex differences in aging remain mostly unknown. Currently, we do not understand the molecular drivers of sex differences in aging, or whether they are related to the accepted hallmarks or pillars of aging or linked to other well-characterized processes. In particular, understanding the role of sex-determination mechanisms and sex differences in aging is relatively understudied. Here, we take a comparative, interdisciplinary approach to explore various hypotheses about how sex differences in aging arise. We discuss genomic, morphological, and environmental differences between the sexes and how these relate to sex differences in aging. Finally, we present some suggestions for future research in this area and provide recommendations for promising experimental designs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available