4.7 Article

Numerical investigation of the scale effects of the flame flashback phenomenon in scramjet combustors

Journal

AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 119, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2021.107165

Keywords

Scale effect; Flame flashback; Supersonic combustion; Large eddy simulation; Flamelet-progress variable model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study highlights the scale effects of flame flashbacks inside an ethylene-fueled scramjet combustor, showing that larger scale engines have the potential to yield more intense combustion and enhance boundary-layer separation. Differences in boundary-layer profiles may result in accelerated flame propagation speed.
The scale effect of flame flashbacks inside an ethylene-fueled scramjet combustor was investigated through an approach that combines numerical, experimental, and theoretical analyses. In the current study, a hybrid large eddy simulation (LES)/flamelet-progress variable (FPV) combustion model was compared with experimental observations and measurements, and a good level of agreement was shown. As the scale changed, the boundary-layer profiles showed differences to some extent. A larger scale engine could obtain higher fuel mixing efficiency and thus had the potential to yield intense combustion, enhancing the downstream backpressure and boundary-layer separation. The gradually separated boundary layer formed a quick thermally choked flow, prompting the flame front to accelerate forward until it was transmitted back to the fuel injection position. The low-speed zone in the interior of the boundary layer was more conducive to combustion enhancement and the formation of positive feedback. In addition, the simplified flame flashback model combined with the flame stabilization model was used to illuminate the scale effects of flame flashback. (c) 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available