4.6 Article

Design and testing of a closing and sealing system for a Phobos sample return mission

Journal

ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH
Volume 69, Issue 2, Pages 1170-1197

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2021.10.041

Keywords

Sample return mission; Closing and sealing mechanism; Containment system; Space equipment testing; Modal analysis; Finite element

Funding

  1. European Space Agency [4000115017/15/NL/PA]
  2. COMOTI - Romanian Research and Development Institute for Gas Turbines

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper focuses on the development and validation of a closing and sealing system for a container designed to safely bring back 100 g of regolith from the surface of Phobos. The system proved capable of overcoming Robotic Arm misalignments, ensuring the Vault closing, and maintaining leak tightness during the trip back to Earth through a series of extensive tests.
The present paper addresses the development of a closing and sealing system for a container which shall safely bring 100 g of regolith from the surface of Phobos, one of the moons of Mars. Based on a set of requirements defined by the ESA (European Space Agency), a design of the closing and sealing system was made and FEA (Finite Element Analysis) was employed to validate the design. The closing and sealing mechanism along with the Vault (container to be sealed) proved the capability to overcome the Robotic Arm misalignments, to ensure the Vault closing and to maintain the leak tightness (maximum admissible leak rate of 10(-4) mbar*l/s Helium) during the trip back to Earth. All these features were validated following an extensive test campaign implying mechanical loads, shocks, thermal vacuum cycling, dust contamination, impact tests and several functional verifications. The mechanism demonstrated the targeted maturity level (TRL 5) and it can be further developed in order to be qualified for a specific mission/application. (C) 2021 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available