4.7 Article

Enhanced thermoelectric performance of CuAlS2 by adding multi-walled carbon nanotubes

Journal

ADVANCED POWDER TECHNOLOGY
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apt.2022.103445

Keywords

CuAlS2 nanoparticles; Multi-walled carbon nanotube; Nanocomposite; Thermoelectric properties

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reports the first-ever investigation of the uniform dispersion of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) in CuAlS2 nanoparticles and the study of their thermoelectric properties. The results show that the addition of carbon nanotubes improves electrical conductivity and Seebeck coefficient, reduces lattice thermal conductivity, and enhances the figure-of-merit of the nanocomposites.
In this paper, we report the first-ever study on a relatively uniform dispersion of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) in CuAlS2 nanoparticles, synthesized by high-energy ball-milling, and study the thermoelectric properties of the bulk materials. A vortex mixer and bath sonicator are used to achieve well dispersion of nanotubes in the matrix, and then the powder is hot-pressed. Carbon nanotubes dispersed in the matrix improve electrical conductivity and Seebeck coefficient. The addition of MWCNT causes an increase in the grain boundary and facilitates phonon scattering, resulting in a reduction in the lattice thermal conductivity and finally total thermal conductivity. The optimum amount of carbon nanotubes is effective for reducing thermal conductivity and increasing electrical conductivity, thereby elevating the figure-of-merit of the nanocomposites. Finally, the figure-of-merit is highly influenced by total thermal conductivity, and the maximum figure-of-merit was obtained for CuAlS2/0.5 wt% MWCNT composite, which indicated about 20% improvement. (C) 2022 The Society of Powder Technology Japan. Published by Elsevier B.V. and The Society of Powder Technology Japan. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available