4.8 Review

Efficiency of Polymer Light-Emitting Diodes: A Perspective

Journal

ADVANCED MATERIALS
Volume 34, Issue 13, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.202108887

Keywords

device physics; external quantum efficiency; outcouping efficiency; polymer light-emitting diodes

Funding

  1. Projekt DEAL

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The various contributions to the external quantum efficiency (EQE) of polymer light-emitting diodes (PLEDs) are discussed. It is found that the inclusion of triplet-triplet annihilation (TTA) contributes significantly to the enhancement of EQE in PLEDs.
The various contributions to the external quantum efficiency (EQE) of polymer light-emitting diodes (PLEDs) are discussed. The EQE of an organic light-emitting diode is governed by a number of parameters, such as the electrical efficiency, the photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY), the optical outcoupling efficiency and the spin statistics for singlet exciton generation. In the last decade, the electrical efficiency has been determined from a numerical PLED device model. More recently, an optical model to simulate the fraction of photons outcoupled to air for PLEDs with a broad recombination zone has been developed. Together with the directly measured PLQY, the EQE of a PLED can then be estimated. However, it has been observed that the measured EQEs of fluorescent PLEDs, including the model system super-yellow poly(p-phenylene vinylene) (SY-PPV) often exceed the expected values. To solve this discrepancy, it is demonstrate that the electrical PLED model has to be expanded by the inclusion of triplet-triplet annihilation (TTA), which is shown to be responsible for a substantial EQE enhancement. Experimentally, it is obtained that TTA contributes to a singlet-exciton generation efficiency of approximate to 40% in SY-PPV PLEDs, giving rise to an EQE of approximate to 4% instead of the expected value of 2.5%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available