4.6 Review

Comparative clinical effectiveness and safety of tobacco cessation pharmacotherapies and electronic cigarettes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Journal

ADDICTION
Volume 117, Issue 4, Pages 861-876

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/add.15675

Keywords

adverse events; bupropion; effectiveness; electronic cigarettes; network meta-analysis; nicotine replacement therapy; safety; smoking; varenicline

Funding

  1. Spanish Government [PID2019-104033GA-I00]
  2. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
  3. NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme [15/58/18]
  4. PROSPERO [CRD42016041302]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the effectiveness and safety of varenicline, bupropion, nicotine replacement therapy, and electronic cigarettes in smokers. Most monotherapies and combination therapies were more effective than placebo, with varenicline appearing to be the most effective based on current evidence. Limited data suggests no strong associations between tobacco cessation pharmacotherapies and adverse events, but there is a need for improved reporting of safety data.
Aim To determine how varenicline, bupropion, nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) and electronic cigarettes compare with respect to their clinical effectiveness and safety. Method Systematic reviews and Bayesian network meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials, in any setting, of varenicline, bupropion, NRT and e-cigarettes (in high, standard and low doses, alone or in combination) in adult smokers and smokeless tobacco users with follow-up duration of 24 weeks or greater (effectiveness) or any duration (safety). Nine databases were searched until 19 February 2019. Primary outcomes were sustained tobacco abstinence and serious adverse events (SAEs). We estimated odds ratios (ORs) and treatment rankings and conducted meta-regression to explore covariates. Results We identified 363 trials for effectiveness and 355 for safety. Most monotherapies and combination therapies were more effective than placebo at helping participants to achieve sustained abstinence; the most effective of these, estimated with some imprecision, were varenicline standard [OR = 2.83, 95% credible interval (CrI) = 2.34-3.39] and varenicline standard + NRT standard (OR = 5.75, 95% CrI = 2.27-14.88). Estimates were higher in smokers receiving counselling than in those without and in studies with higher baseline nicotine dependence scores than in those with lower scores. Varenicline standard + NRT standard showed a high probability of being ranked best or second-best. For safety, only bupropion at standard dose increased the odds of experiencing SAEs compared with placebo (OR = 1.27, 95% CrI = 1.04-1.58), and we found no evidence of effect modification. Conclusions Most tobacco cessation monotherapies and combination therapies are more effective than placebo at helping participants to achieve sustained abstinence, with varenicline appearing to be most effective based on current evidence. There does not appear to be strong evidence of associations between most tobacco cessation pharmacotherapies and adverse events; however, the data are limited and there is a need for improved reporting of safety data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available