Can optimized model-based iterative reconstruction improve the contrast of liver lesions in CT?

Background: Computed tomography is a standard imaging procedure for the detection of liver lesions, such as metastases, which can often be small and poorly contrasted, and therefore hard to detect. Advances in image reconstruction have shown promise in reducing image noise and improving low-contrast detectability. Purpose: To examine a novel, specialized, model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) technique for improved low-contrast liver lesion detection. Material and Methods: Patient images with reported poorly contrasted focal liver lesions were retrospectively reconstructed with the low-contrast attenuating algorithm (FIRST-LCD) from primary raw data. Liver-to-lesion contrast, signal-to-noise, and contrast-to-noise ratios for background and liver noise for each lesion were compared for all three FIRST-LCD presets with the established hybrid iterative reconstruction method (AIDR-3D). An additional visual conspicuity score was given by two experienced radiologists for each lesion. Results: A total of 82 lesions in 57 examinations were included in the analysis. All three FIRST-LCD algorithms provided statistically significant increases in liver-to-lesion contrast, with FIRSTMILD showing the largest increase (40.47 HU in AIDR-3D; 45.84 HU in FIRSTMILD; P < 0.001). Substantial improvement was shown in contrast-to-noise metrics. Visual analysis of the lesions shows decreased lesion visibility with all FIRST methods in comparison to AIDR-3D, with FIRSTSTR showing the closest results (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Objective image metrics show promise for MBIR methods in improving the detectability of low-contrast liver lesions; however, subjective image quality may be perceived as inferior. Further improvements are necessary to enhance image quality and lesion detection.

Automated summary

This study examined a novel model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) technique for improved detection of low-contrast liver lesions. Objective image metrics showed promise for MBIR methods in improving detectability, but subjective image quality may be perceived as inferior.